Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- reviews:wikis [2011/04/29 23:54] – external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ reviews:wikis [2023/04/12 20:44] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 **Confluence** looks awesome.  I was a big fan of [[http://fishbowl.pastiche.org/|Charles Miller]] even before he joined Atlassian.  And I have a good friend who uses Confluence.  I wouldn't be surprised if it was worth the money.  Unfortunately, my budget is $0.00.
-**DokuWiki** is the best option of all. It is light-weight, the wiki syntax is the most inuitive, the code is well organized and easy to modify, development is ongoing, it has the rss feed, editing toolbar and wiki syntax, discussion pages, section editing (see the edit buttons to the right), and plenty of plugins. DokiWiki prints pages intelligently, leaving out the sidebar, but expanding the link urls. DokuWiki [[http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary/main.cgi?function=display_term&term_id=66|affords]] technical documentation better than the others. And that's the most important attribute.
+**DokuWiki** is the best option of all. It is light-weight, the wiki syntax is the most inuitive, the code is well organized and easy to modify, development is ongoing, it has the rss feed, editing toolbar and wiki syntax, discussion pages, section editing (see the edit buttons to the right), and plenty of plugins. DokiWiki prints pages intelligently, leaving out the sidebar, but expanding the link urls. DokuWiki [[http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary/affordance/|affords]] technical documentation better than the others. And that's the most important attribute.
 ==== Summary ====